Parks & Recreation Spending by City 2026

Parks are often the first thing residents notice about their city — and the first budget line to get cut during tough times. Some cities invest heavily in world-class park systems while others spend less than $20 per resident. This analysis ranks 800+ cities by per-capita parks and recreation spending.

Top 25 Cities by Parks Spending Per Capita

Cities that lead in parks spending typically have extensive park systems, strong recreation programming, and a political culture that prioritizes outdoor spaces. Many are in the West, where outdoor recreation is deeply embedded in city identity.

Parks Spending in America's Largest Cities

Cities Spending the Least on Parks

Cities at the bottom of parks spending may rely on county or regional park districts, have limited parkland, or prioritize other budget categories during fiscal constraints.

Why Parks Spending Matters

• Public health: Access to parks reduces obesity rates, improves mental health, and increases physical activity levels across all age groups.
• Property values: Homes near well-maintained parks sell for 5–20% more, generating higher property tax revenue for the city.
• Climate resilience: Urban parks reduce heat island effects, manage stormwater, and improve air quality.
• Economic development: Quality parks attract residents, businesses, and tourism dollars. Cities like Austin, Portland, and Denver cite their park systems as key economic differentiators.
• Equity: Parks spending is a measure of how cities invest in shared public spaces that benefit all residents regardless of income.

Frequently Asked Questions