Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Hoffman Estates, IL

Population: 51,744 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

A
81/100

Excellent fiscal health — strong reserves, low debt, well-funded pensions

Total Spending
$1.1B
Per Capita
$21,538
Total Revenue
$1.9B
Total Debt
$0

Spending Breakdown

Other
45.0%$502.1M
Housing & Community Development
19.1%$212.6M
Utilities
17.4%$193.8M
Parks & Recreation
9.2%$102.8M
Public Welfare
8.2%$91.8M
Fire Protection
1.0%$11.4M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Income Tax
1.6%$30.1M
Intergovernmental
35.1%$682.6M
Charges & Fees
9.4%$181.9M
Other
12.5%$243.7M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection$221/person
Parks & Recreation$1,987/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)100/100
Debt Burden (20%)100/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)40/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)98/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Compare Cities

See how Hoffman Estates stacks up against another city.

vs Chicago, ILvs Aurora, ILvs Joliet, IL
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Illinois

Frequently Asked Questions

Hoffman Estates, IL spends $21,538 per resident, based on total expenditures of $1.1B for a population of 51,744. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of A (81/100).

Hoffman Estates, IL has total expenditures of $1.1B and total revenue of $1.9B. The city carries $0 in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Hoffman Estates, IL employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Hoffman Estates, IL has a Fiscal Health Score of A (81/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.