Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Updated April 2026 · U.S. Census Bureau data

Total Spending Per Capita

This ranking compares 684 U.S. cities by total spending per capita. Higher values rank worse. Data is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances. Always read a single ranking with the rest of a city's profile, no one number tells the full fiscal story.

Related Rankings

Top 100 Cities by Total Spending Per Capita

#CityGradeTotal Spending Per Capita
1Santa Clara, CAC$807,303
2Alameda, CAC$637,110
3Maricopa, AZD$398,381
4Orange, CAD$372,005
5Washington, DCD$243,341
6Monterey Park, CAC$243,079
7San Bernardino, CAD$238,232
8San Buenaventura (Ventura), CAD$220,511
9Riverside, CAC$188,026
10San Mateo, CAC$185,341
11San Francisco, CAD$184,131
12Tulare, CAC$172,207
13Sarasota, FLC$168,190
14Frederick, MDC$160,619
15Santa Barbara, CAC$139,120
16Santa Cruz, CAC$138,595
17Cambridge, MAC$130,737
18New York, NYC$129,119
19Hamilton, OHB$116,276
20Gulfport, MSC$116,149
21Miami Beach, FLC$89,503
22Los Angeles, CAD$85,432
23Union City, NJC$81,440
24Santa Monica, CAD$79,891
25Merced, CAD$77,022
26Hartford, CTC$76,660
27Rochester, NYD$75,154
28Boston, MAC$72,299
29Sacramento, CAC$71,020
30New Brunswick, NJD$70,317
31Passaic, NJC$70,270
32Trenton, NJC$69,951
33East Orange, NJD$69,459
34Arlington, VAC$69,233
35Baltimore, MDB$67,935
36New Haven, CTC$66,510
37Huntington Park, CAC$65,653
38Springfield, MAD$65,626
39Flint, MIF$65,339
40Yonkers, NYC$62,907
41Richmond, VAD$61,661
42Urban Honolulu, HID$61,430
43Ontario, CAC$61,412
44Buffalo, NYC$60,354
45Newton, MAD$60,337
46Madera, CAC$60,288
47Brockton, MAD$58,373
48Brookline, MAD$58,050
49Alexandria, VAC$57,994
50Newport News, VAF$56,948
51West New York, NJD$56,635
52Philadelphia, PAD$56,272
53Syracuse, NYC$55,830
54Camden, NJD$55,742
55Norman, OKD$55,648
56Waterbury, CTD$55,426
57Napa, CAD$55,211
58Lynn, MAD$54,972
59Lawrence, MAD$52,564
60Norwalk, CTC$52,486
61Stamford, CTC$52,355
62Broomfield, COD$52,307
63Framingham, MAD$51,890
64Lancaster, PAC$51,351
65Norfolk, VAD$50,880
66Lawrence, KSD$50,571
67Bayonne, NJC$50,508
68East Hartford, CTD$50,447
69Providence, RIF$50,124
70West Hartford, CTB$49,530
71New Bedford, MAD$49,215
72Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), TND$48,948
73Lowell, MAC$48,457
74Milford city (balance), CTC$48,322
75Bridgeport, CTB$48,031
76Anchorage, AKC$47,921
77New Britain, CTD$47,715
78Suffolk, VAB$47,680
79Delray Beach, FLD$47,360
80Quincy, MAD$47,287
81Portsmouth, VAB$46,704
82Albany, NYC$46,595
83Warwick, RIC$46,415
84Peabody, MAD$46,262
85Indianapolis city (balance), INB$46,045
86Chesapeake, VAD$45,860
87Hampton, VAC$45,522
88Revere, MAD$45,493
89Waltham, MAD$45,238
90Bristol, CTD$44,977
91Ames, IAF$44,915
92Taunton, MAF$44,737
93Schenectady, NYD$44,459
94Baton Rouge, LAB$43,886
95Erie, PAD$43,394
96Fresno, CAC$43,387
97Danbury, CTC$43,358
98Chicopee, MAF$43,310
99San Diego, CAC$43,306
100Greenville, SCD$43,093

Showing top 100 of 684 cities

What the Numbers Show

At the top of the ranking, Santa Clara, CA posts $807,303, with Alameda, CA close behind at $637,110. At the other end, Scottsdale, AZ sits at $21. The spread between top and bottom in this metric reflects real differences in service mix, peer-group cost structure, and policy priorities, not just budget size.

Per-capita figures can be sensitive to population estimates: a city whose American Community Survey count is undercounting recent growth will look like an outlier-high spender. Where rankings rely on payroll, employee counts, or pension data, the input dataset is noted in the FAQ. Always pair a single ranking with the underlying city profile before drawing fiscal-health conclusions.

Methodology

Per-capita figures divide the relevant Census-reported expenditure or revenue line by American Community Survey population estimates. Per-capita ratios are most useful inside a population peer group; comparing a 60,000-resident city to a 600,000-resident city directly can mislead because larger cities run more services and absorb regional commuters. For full methodology and weight-by-weight breakdown of the composite Fiscal Health Score, see the methodology page. Underlying datasets include the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities for the 150 largest cities, and best-practice guidance from the Government Finance Officers Association.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the total spending per capita ranking?

This ranking compares 684 U.S. cities by total spending per capita. Higher values rank worse. Data is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances. Always read a single ranking with the rest of a city's profile, no one number tells the full fiscal story. Santa Clara, CA currently leads the ranking at $807,303.

Where does the data come from?

Every figure traces back to U.S. Census Bureau primary data: the Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances for spending and revenue, and the American Community Survey for population estimates used to compute per-capita ratios. Pension data, where used, comes from the Public Plans Database; federal grant flows come from USASpending.gov.

How often is the ranking updated?

The Census Bureau publishes the Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances roughly 18 months after the close of the fiscal year. CitySpend rebuilds the rankings whenever new Census microdata is released, typically once a year. The current data reflects the most recent Census release available at the page-update time shown above.

Is being ranked low always bad?

Not always. A high per-capita spending or debt figure can reflect deferred-maintenance catch-up, strong investment in parks and infrastructure, or the city operating services other cities outsource. Always read the city profile and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (ACFR) before drawing conclusions.

How is this metric calculated?

Per-capita figures divide the relevant Census-reported expenditure or revenue line by American Community Survey population estimates. Per-capita ratios are most useful inside a population peer group; comparing a 60,000-resident city to a 600,000-resident city directly can mislead because larger cities run more services and absorb regional commuters.

This ranking compares 684 U.S. cities by total spending per capita. Higher values rank worse. Data is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances. Always read a single ranking with the rest of a city's profile, no one number tells the full fiscal story.