Naperville, IL vs Springfield, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Springfield, IL and Naperville, IL spend within 0.1% of each other per resident — $15,771 versus $15,751 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
Springfield, IL holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 45/100 (grade D) for Naperville, IL — a 23-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Naperville, IL carries the lighter load at $1,028 per resident versus $2,441 for Springfield, IL. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Naperville, IL leads with health at $1,028 per resident, while Springfield, IL leads with highways and roads at $1,079.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Naperville, IL at 68% of total revenue, whereas Springfield, IL relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 17%.
Summary
Springfield spends 0.1% more per capita than Naperville ($20/person difference). Springfield, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $0 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $458 | $18,701 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,765 | $2,314 |
| Other | $2,388 | $1,274 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $1,079 |
| Education | $0 | $106 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $1,275 |
| Health | $1,028 | $388 |
| Parks & Recreation | $544 | $325 |
| Utilities | $4,527 | $1,570 |
| Other | $9,652 | $11,028 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.