Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Naperville, IL vs Chicago, IL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 54.4% more per capita than Naperville ($18,801/person difference). Chicago, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Naperville, IL
Pop. 149,089
D
45/100
Budget Balance24
Debt Burden27
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency87
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Naperville
Chicago
Total Spending
$2.3B
$94.0B
Spending / Capita
$15,751
$34,551
Total Revenue
$1.0B
$231.6B
Revenue / Capita
$6,975
$85,083
Total Debt
$153.2M
$2.7B
Debt / Capita
$1,028
$977
Population
149,089
2,721,914
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Naperville$0
Chicago$10,754
Highways & Roads
Naperville$0
Chicago$930
Parks & Recreation
Naperville$544
Chicago$122
Health
Naperville$1,028
Chicago$426

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

NapervilleChicago
Property Tax
$0
$26
Sales Tax
$0
$74
Income Tax
$0
$229
Intergovernmental
$458
$85,083
Charges & Fees
$4,765
$2,847
Other
$2,388
$3,463

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

NapervilleChicago
Fire Protection
$0
$10,754
Highways & Roads
$0
$930
Public Welfare
$0
$1,858
Health
$1,028
$426
Hospitals
$0
$1,444
Parks & Recreation
$544
$122
Housing
$0
$6,520
Sewerage
$0
$129
Utilities
$4,527
$2,983
Other
$9,652
$9,385
D
Naperville, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 45/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities