Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Chicago, IL vs Naperville, IL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Chicago spends 119.4% more per capita than Naperville ($18,801/person difference). Chicago, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Chicago, IL
Pop. 2,721,914
C
61/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden61
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Naperville, IL
Pop. 149,089
D
45/100
Budget Balance24
Debt Burden27
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency87
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Chicago
Naperville
Total Spending
$94.0B
$2.3B
Spending / Capita
$34,551
$15,751
Total Revenue
$231.6B
$1.0B
Revenue / Capita
$85,083
$6,975
Total Debt
$2.7B
$153.2M
Debt / Capita
$977
$1,028
Population
2,721,914
149,089
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Chicago$10,754
Naperville$0
Highways & Roads
Chicago$930
Naperville$0
Parks & Recreation
Chicago$122
Naperville$544
Health
Chicago$426
Naperville$1,028

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoNaperville
Property Tax
$26
$0
Sales Tax
$74
$0
Income Tax
$229
$0
Intergovernmental
$85,083
$458
Charges & Fees
$2,847
$4,765
Other
$3,463
$2,388

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChicagoNaperville
Fire Protection
$10,754
$0
Highways & Roads
$930
$0
Public Welfare
$1,858
$0
Health
$426
$1,028
Hospitals
$1,444
$0
Parks & Recreation
$122
$544
Housing
$6,520
$0
Sewerage
$129
$0
Utilities
$2,983
$4,527
Other
$9,385
$9,652
C
Chicago, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health
D
Naperville, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 45/100
Below average fiscal health

Compare More Cities