Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Champaign, IL vs Naperville, IL

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Naperville spends 3.7% more per capita than Champaign ($578/person difference). Champaign, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 55/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Champaign, IL
Pop. 88,628
C
55/100
Budget Balance9
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency82
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Naperville, IL
Pop. 149,089
D
45/100
Budget Balance24
Debt Burden27
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency87
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Champaign
Naperville
Total Spending
$1.3B
$2.3B
Spending / Capita
$15,173
$15,751
Total Revenue
$146.9M
$1.0B
Revenue / Capita
$1,657
$6,975
Total Debt
$0
$153.2M
Debt / Capita
$0
$1,028
Population
88,628
149,089
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Champaign$1,426
Naperville$0
Fire Protection
Champaign$488
Naperville$0
Highways & Roads
Champaign$231
Naperville$0
Parks & Recreation
Champaign$0
Naperville$544
Health
Champaign$0
Naperville$1,028

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChampaignNaperville
Intergovernmental
$4,573
$458
Charges & Fees
$0
$4,765
Other
$1,152
$2,388

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

ChampaignNaperville
Police
$1,426
$0
Fire Protection
$488
$0
Highways & Roads
$231
$0
Public Welfare
$465
$0
Health
$0
$1,028
Parks & Recreation
$0
$544
Housing
$895
$0
Utilities
$5
$4,527
Other
$11,663
$9,652
C
Champaign, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 55/100
Average fiscal health
D
Naperville, IL
Fiscal Health Score: 45/100
Below average fiscal health

Compare More Cities