Champaign, IL vs Naperville, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Naperville spends 3.7% more per capita than Champaign ($578/person difference). Champaign, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 55/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Intergovernmental | $4,573 | $458 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,765 |
| Other | $1,152 | $2,388 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,426 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $488 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $231 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $465 | $0 |
| Health | $0 | $1,028 |
| Parks & Recreation | $0 | $544 |
| Housing | $895 | $0 |
| Utilities | $5 | $4,527 |
| Other | $11,663 | $9,652 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.