Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Orland Park, IL

Population: 58,345 (2022) · Small Cities (50K–100K)

D
44/100

Below average — significant fiscal challenges in multiple areas

Total Spending
$916.5M
Per Capita
$15,708
Total Revenue
$577.6M
Total Debt
$78.1M

Spending Breakdown

Other
52.0%$476.4M
Utilities
25.2%$230.7M
Parks & Recreation
14.6%$134.0M
Public Welfare
8.2%$75.4M

Spending data sourced from the Census Bureau's Annual Survey of State & Local Government Finances. Per-capita comparisons use the Lincoln Institute's Fiscally Standardized Cities methodology for fair cross-city benchmarking.

Revenue Sources

Sales Tax
0.1%$682K
Intergovernmental
58.1%$335.7M
Charges & Fees
59.1%$341.2M
Other
18.8%$108.3M

Per Capita Spending by Department

Parks & Recreation$2,296/person

Score Breakdown

Budget Balance & Reserves (25%)50/100
Debt Burden (20%)0/100
Pension Funding (20%)76/100
Spending Efficiency (15%)78/100
Revenue Diversity (10%)0/100
Trend Direction (10%)50/100

Debt Overview

Total Debt$78.1M
Long-Term Debt$89.2M
Debt Per Capita$1,338
Cash & Securities$25.5M

Compare Cities

See how Orland Park stacks up against another city.

vs Chicago, ILvs Aurora, ILvs Joliet, IL
Data source: U.S. Census Bureau, Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances (2023). Population from American Community Survey.

Other Cities in Illinois

Frequently Asked Questions

Orland Park, IL spends $15,708 per resident, based on total expenditures of $916.5M for a population of 58,345. The city has a Fiscal Health Score of D (44/100).

Orland Park, IL has total expenditures of $916.5M and total revenue of $577.6M. The city carries $78.1M in total debt, based on Census Bureau data from 2023.

Orland Park, IL employs 0 government workers, of which 0 are full-time. The average government salary is $0, with 0.0 employees per 10,000 residents.

Orland Park, IL has a Fiscal Health Score of D (44/100). This score evaluates budget balance, debt burden, pension funding, spending efficiency, revenue diversity, and 3-year fiscal trajectory compared to peer cities of similar population.