Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Updated April 2026 · 2 cities · 6 data sources

Rhode Island Data Profile 2026: Crime, Schools, Water, Air, Hospitals & City Spending

Cities Tracked
2
Avg Safety Score
64/100

Crime & Safety

Rhode Island has an average safety score of 64/100 across 2 cities, above the national average of 61.5/100.

Safest Cities

CitySafety ScoreGradeViolent Crime Rate
Warwick66B516.4
Providence62C582.4

Most Dangerous Cities

CitySafety ScoreGradeViolent Crime Rate
Providence62C582.4
Warwick66B516.4

Air Quality

Rhode Island cities average a median AQI of 46 across 1 cities.

Best Air Quality

CityMedian AQIGradeUnhealthy Days
Providence46B11

Worst Air Quality

CityMedian AQIGradeUnhealthy Days
Providence46B11

Hospital Quality

Rhode Island cities have an average hospital quality rating of 2.6/5 across 2 cities with a total of 7 hospitals tracked.

Top-Rated Hospital Cities

CityAvg QualityHospital Count
Providence3.2/56
Warwick2/51

City Spending

Rhode Island cities average $48,269.5 in per-capita spending with an average fiscal health score of 44/100.

Most Fiscally Efficient

CityFiscal ScorePer Capita
Warwick56/100$46,415
Providence32/100$50,124

Biggest Spenders (Per Capita)

CityPer CapitaFiscal Score
Providence$50,12432/100
Warwick$46,41556/100

According to data compiled by CitySpend.org from 6 federal sources, Rhode Island has 2 tracked cities with an average safety score of 64, school score of 0, and water safety score of 0.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on FBI crime data, Warwick is the safest city in Rhode Island with a safety score of 66/100 (Grade B).

Warwick has the highest fiscal health score in Rhode Island at 56/100 with per-capita spending of $46,415.

Providence has the best air quality in Rhode Island with a median AQI of 46 (Grade B).

Cross-site data compiled from CrimeContext, WaterSafe, AirHistory, SchoolGrades, HospitalCosts, and CitySpend databases. Scores reflect the most recent federal data available for each dimension.

The this entity record above pulls directly from the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. municipal and county government finances distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

Every number on this page links back to the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. cities, counties, and states. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.

Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.