Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Worcester, MA vs Fall River, MA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Worcester spends 1.9% more per capita than Fall River ($798/person difference). Worcester, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Worcester, MA
Pop. 204,191
C
58/100
Budget Balance36
Debt Burden95
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Fall River, MA
Pop. 93,638
D
41/100
Budget Balance17
Debt Burden32
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Worcester
Fall River
Total Spending
$8.6B
$3.9B
Spending / Capita
$42,049
$41,251
Total Revenue
$9.2B
$3.3B
Revenue / Capita
$45,275
$35,606
Total Debt
$93.0M
$54.8M
Debt / Capita
$456
$585
Population
204,191
93,638
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Worcester$186
Fall River$265
Highways & Roads
Worcester$163
Fall River$0
Parks & Recreation
Worcester$461
Fall River$211
Education
Worcester$28,887
Fall River$28,175
Health
Worcester$349
Fall River$178

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

WorcesterFall River
Sales Tax
$457
$165
Income Tax
$231
$0
Intergovernmental
$4,140
$5,430
Charges & Fees
$1,465
$1,459
Other
$3,233
$4,494

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

WorcesterFall River
Fire Protection
$186
$265
Highways & Roads
$163
$0
Education
$28,887
$28,175
Public Welfare
$889
$581
Health
$349
$178
Hospitals
$534
$602
Parks & Recreation
$461
$211
Housing
$2,901
$2,452
Sewerage
$209
$127
Utilities
$1,046
$1,773
Other
$6,424
$6,887
C
Worcester, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 58/100
Average fiscal health
D
Fall River, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 41/100
Below average fiscal health

Compare More Cities