Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Fall River, MA vs Worcester, MA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Worcester spends 1.9% more per capita than Fall River ($798/person difference). Worcester, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 58/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Fall River, MA
Pop. 93,638
D
41/100
Budget Balance17
Debt Burden32
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Worcester, MA
Pop. 204,191
C
58/100
Budget Balance36
Debt Burden95
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Fall River
Worcester
Total Spending
$3.9B
$8.6B
Spending / Capita
$41,251
$42,049
Total Revenue
$3.3B
$9.2B
Revenue / Capita
$35,606
$45,275
Total Debt
$54.8M
$93.0M
Debt / Capita
$585
$456
Population
93,638
204,191
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Fall River$265
Worcester$186
Highways & Roads
Fall River$0
Worcester$163
Parks & Recreation
Fall River$211
Worcester$461
Education
Fall River$28,175
Worcester$28,887
Health
Fall River$178
Worcester$349

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Fall RiverWorcester
Sales Tax
$165
$457
Income Tax
$0
$231
Intergovernmental
$5,430
$4,140
Charges & Fees
$1,459
$1,465
Other
$4,494
$3,233

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Fall RiverWorcester
Fire Protection
$265
$186
Highways & Roads
$0
$163
Education
$28,175
$28,887
Public Welfare
$581
$889
Health
$178
$349
Hospitals
$602
$534
Parks & Recreation
$211
$461
Housing
$2,452
$2,901
Sewerage
$127
$209
Utilities
$1,773
$1,046
Other
$6,887
$6,424
D
Fall River, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 41/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Worcester, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 58/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities