Wichita, KS vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Wichita, KS spends 52% more per resident than Tulsa, OK: $7,986 against $5,250. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 34-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Wichita, KS leads with parks and recreation at $874 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Wichita spends 52.1% more per capita than Tulsa ($2,736/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $246 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $0 |
| Other | $2,783 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $152 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $257 |
| Education | $2 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $86 |
| Health | $254 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $154 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $27 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.