Tulsa, OK vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Wichita, KS spends 52% more per resident than Tulsa, OK: $7,986 against $5,250. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 34-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Wichita, KS leads with parks and recreation at $874.
Summary
Wichita spends 34.3% more per capita than Tulsa ($2,736/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,193 |
| Other | $53 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $126 |
| Education | $0 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $441 |
| Health | $762 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $874 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,618 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $70 |
| Other | $2,748 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.