Wichita, KS vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $7,986, a 332% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for Seattle, WA — a 29-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Wichita, KS carries the lighter load at $132 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Wichita, KS at $874 per resident and in Seattle, WA at $3,923.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 14% of total revenue in Wichita, KS and 13% in Seattle, WA.
Summary
Seattle spends 76.8% more per capita than Wichita ($26,477/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $246 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $3,960 |
| Other | $2,783 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $152 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $0 |
| Education | $2 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $3,439 |
| Health | $254 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $952 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $6,489 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.