Seattle, WA vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $7,986, a 332% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for Seattle, WA — a 29-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Wichita, KS carries the lighter load at $132 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Seattle, WA at $3,923 per resident and in Wichita, KS at $874.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 13% of total revenue in Seattle, WA and 14% in Wichita, KS.
Summary
Seattle spends 331.5% more per capita than Wichita ($26,477/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,831 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $1,094 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $3,496 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,846 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,960 | $3,193 |
| Other | $8,544 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $210 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $126 |
| Education | $1,461 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $3,439 | $441 |
| Health | $1,131 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $1,871 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,923 | $874 |
| Housing | $3,727 | $2,618 |
| Sewerage | $952 | $0 |
| Utilities | $6,489 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $70 |
| Other | $11,260 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.