Wichita, KS vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Omaha spends 28.6% more per capita than Wichita ($3,194/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $246 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $0 |
| Other | $2,783 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $152 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $319 |
| Education | $2 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $1,521 |
| Health | $254 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $742 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $3,045 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.