Omaha, NE vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Omaha, NE spends 40% more per resident than Wichita, KS: $11,180 against $7,986. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Omaha, NE and Wichita, KS both land at 90/100 (grade A and A respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
Omaha, NE reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Wichita, KS carries $132 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Omaha, NE at $742 per resident and in Wichita, KS at $874.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Omaha, NE at 17% of total revenue, whereas Wichita, KS relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 14%.
Summary
Omaha spends 40.0% more per capita than Wichita ($3,194/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,193 |
| Other | $4,672 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $126 |
| Education | $0 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $441 |
| Health | $456 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $874 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $2,618 |
| Utilities | $581 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $70 |
| Other | $4,516 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.