Wichita, KS vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $7,986, a 174% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Minneapolis, MN — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Wichita, KS carries the lighter load at $132 per resident versus $644 for Minneapolis, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Wichita, KS at $874 per resident and in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Wichita, KS at 14% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 63.6% more per capita than Wichita ($13,924/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $246 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $57 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,895 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,193 | $2,040 |
| Other | $2,783 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $152 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $126 | $221 |
| Education | $2 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $441 | $1,500 |
| Health | $254 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $113 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $874 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $2,618 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $570 |
| Utilities | $1,225 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $70 | $0 |
| Other | $2,111 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.