Minneapolis, MN vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $7,986, a 174% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 65/100 (grade B) for Minneapolis, MN — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Wichita, KS carries the lighter load at $132 per resident versus $644 for Minneapolis, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Minneapolis, MN at $3,486 per resident and in Wichita, KS at $874.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Minneapolis, MN at 17% of total revenue, whereas Wichita, KS relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 14%.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 174.4% more per capita than Wichita ($13,924/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $3,193 |
| Other | $3,254 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $683 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $126 |
| Education | $0 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $441 |
| Health | $0 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $874 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $2,618 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $0 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $70 |
| Other | $8,919 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.