Westminster, CO vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Westminster, CO spends 24% more per resident than Colorado Springs, CO: $16,434 against $13,222. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Westminster, CO edges Colorado Springs, CO on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 59/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Westminster, CO carries the lighter load at $1,137 per resident versus $3,063 for Colorado Springs, CO. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Westminster, CO leads with parks and recreation at $2,000 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Westminster, CO at 15% of total revenue, whereas Colorado Springs, CO relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Westminster spends 24.3% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($3,211/person difference). Westminster, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,178 | $257 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,709 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,287 | $5,676 |
| Other | $3,595 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $302 | $1,266 |
| Highways & Roads | $297 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $964 | $575 |
| Health | $335 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,115 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,000 | $376 |
| Housing | $3,232 | $2,713 |
| Utilities | $1,475 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $6,713 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.