Colorado Springs, CO vs Westminster, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Westminster, CO spends 24% more per resident than Colorado Springs, CO: $16,434 against $13,222. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Westminster, CO edges Colorado Springs, CO on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 62/100 (grade C) to 59/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Westminster, CO carries the lighter load at $1,137 per resident versus $3,063 for Colorado Springs, CO. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Westminster, CO leads with parks and recreation at $2,000.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Colorado Springs, CO at 13% of total revenue, whereas Westminster, CO relies most on charges and fees at 15%.
Summary
Westminster spends 19.5% more per capita than Colorado Springs ($3,211/person difference). Westminster, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $1,178 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $2,709 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $4,287 |
| Other | $2,678 | $3,595 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $302 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $297 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $964 |
| Health | $0 | $335 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $1,115 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $2,000 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $3,232 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $1,475 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $6,713 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.