Westminster, CO vs Centennial, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Westminster, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $16,434 versus $54, a 30406% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 62/100 (grade C) for Westminster, CO — a 18-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Centennial, CO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Westminster, CO carries $1,137 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Westminster, CO at $2,000 per resident and in Centennial, CO at $54.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Westminster, CO at 15% of total revenue, whereas Centennial, CO relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Westminster spends 30405.8% more per capita than Centennial ($16,380/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,178 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,709 | $243 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,287 | $0 |
| Other | $3,595 | $0 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $302 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $297 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $964 | $0 |
| Health | $335 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,115 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,000 | $54 |
| Housing | $3,232 | $0 |
| Utilities | $1,475 | $0 |
| Other | $6,713 | $0 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.