Centennial, CO vs Westminster, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Westminster, CO outspends Centennial, CO by a wide margin per resident — $16,434 versus $54, a 30406% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Centennial, CO holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 80/100 (grade A) against 62/100 (grade C) for Westminster, CO — a 18-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Centennial, CO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Westminster, CO carries $1,137 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Centennial, CO at $54 per resident and in Westminster, CO at $2,000.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Centennial, CO at 100% of total revenue, whereas Westminster, CO relies most on charges and fees at 15%.
Summary
Westminster spends 99.7% more per capita than Centennial ($16,380/person difference). Centennial, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 80/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $0 | $1,178 |
| Intergovernmental | $243 | $2,709 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,287 |
| Other | $0 | $3,595 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $302 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $297 |
| Public Welfare | $0 | $964 |
| Health | $0 | $335 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,115 |
| Parks & Recreation | $54 | $2,000 |
| Housing | $0 | $3,232 |
| Utilities | $0 | $1,475 |
| Other | $0 | $6,713 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.