Washington, DC vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Washington spends 2076.6% more per capita than Omaha ($232,161/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
D
41/100
Budget Balance45
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Washington
Omaha
Total Spending
$163.2B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$243,341
$11,180
Total Revenue
$186.2B
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$277,701
$26,929
Total Debt
$1.7B
$0
Debt / Capita
$2,516
$0
Population
670,587
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Washington$4,183
Omaha$0
Fire Protection
Washington$4,262
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Washington$1,435
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Washington$5,459
Omaha$742
Education
Washington$53,224
Omaha$0
Health
Washington$1,009
Omaha$456
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
WashingtonOmaha
| Property Tax | $25 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $991 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $141 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $18,754 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,070 | $0 |
| Other | $11,518 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
WashingtonOmaha
| Police | $4,183 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $4,262 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,435 | $319 |
| Education | $53,224 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,498 | $1,521 |
| Health | $1,009 | $456 |
| Hospitals | $17,668 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $5,459 | $742 |
| Housing | $10,296 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $2,881 | $0 |
| Utilities | $88,990 | $581 |
| Interest on Debt | $58 | $0 |
| General Admin | $3,225 | $0 |
| Other | $48,155 | $4,516 |
D
Washington, DC
Fiscal Health Score: 41/100
Below average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health