Omaha, NE vs Washington, DC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Washington spends 95.4% more per capita than Omaha ($232,161/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
A
90/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
D
41/100
Budget Balance45
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Washington
Total Spending
$5.5B
$163.2B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$243,341
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$186.2B
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$277,701
Total Debt
$0
$1.7B
Debt / Capita
$0
$2,516
Population
489,201
670,587
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Omaha$0
Washington$4,183
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Washington$4,262
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Washington$1,435
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Washington$5,459
Education
Omaha$0
Washington$53,224
Health
Omaha$456
Washington$1,009
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaWashington
| Property Tax | $624 | $25 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $991 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $141 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $18,754 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,070 |
| Other | $4,672 | $11,518 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaWashington
| Police | $0 | $4,183 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $4,262 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $1,435 |
| Education | $0 | $53,224 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $2,498 |
| Health | $456 | $1,009 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $17,668 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $5,459 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $10,296 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $2,881 |
| Utilities | $581 | $88,990 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $58 |
| General Admin | $0 | $3,225 |
| Other | $4,516 | $48,155 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
D
Washington, DC
Fiscal Health Score: 41/100
Below average fiscal health