Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Warwick, RI vs Cranston, RI

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Warwick spends 11.7% more per capita than Cranston ($4,872/person difference). Warwick, RI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Warwick, RI
Pop. 82,783
C
56/100
Budget Balance23
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Cranston, RI
Pop. 82,691
D
47/100
Budget Balance26
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Warwick
Cranston
Total Spending
$3.8B
$3.4B
Spending / Capita
$46,415
$41,543
Total Revenue
$1.4B
$1.1B
Revenue / Capita
$17,107
$12,769
Total Debt
$13.7M
$0
Debt / Capita
$165
$0
Population
82,783
82,691
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Warwick$265
Cranston$866
Highways & Roads
Warwick$147
Cranston$0
Parks & Recreation
Warwick$284
Cranston$475
Education
Warwick$26,642
Cranston$26,714
Health
Warwick$12
Cranston$507

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

WarwickCranston
Sales Tax
$103
$85
Intergovernmental
$2,416
$12,769
Charges & Fees
$1,544
$0
Other
$3,289
$4,701

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

WarwickCranston
Fire Protection
$265
$866
Highways & Roads
$147
$0
Education
$26,642
$26,714
Public Welfare
$1,000
$2,195
Health
$12
$507
Hospitals
$585
$236
Parks & Recreation
$284
$475
Housing
$2,809
$4,165
Sewerage
$116
$152
Utilities
$1,704
$0
Other
$12,850
$6,233
C
Warwick, RI
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
D
Cranston, RI
Fiscal Health Score: 47/100
Below average fiscal health

Compare More Cities