Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Cranston, RI vs Warwick, RI

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Warwick spends 10.5% more per capita than Cranston ($4,872/person difference). Warwick, RI has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Cranston, RI
Pop. 82,691
D
47/100
Budget Balance26
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Warwick, RI
Pop. 82,783
C
56/100
Budget Balance23
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Cranston
Warwick
Total Spending
$3.4B
$3.8B
Spending / Capita
$41,543
$46,415
Total Revenue
$1.1B
$1.4B
Revenue / Capita
$12,769
$17,107
Total Debt
$0
$13.7M
Debt / Capita
$0
$165
Population
82,691
82,783
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Cranston$866
Warwick$265
Highways & Roads
Cranston$0
Warwick$147
Parks & Recreation
Cranston$475
Warwick$284
Education
Cranston$26,714
Warwick$26,642
Health
Cranston$507
Warwick$12

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

CranstonWarwick
Sales Tax
$85
$103
Intergovernmental
$12,769
$2,416
Charges & Fees
$0
$1,544
Other
$4,701
$3,289

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

CranstonWarwick
Fire Protection
$866
$265
Highways & Roads
$0
$147
Education
$26,714
$26,642
Public Welfare
$2,195
$1,000
Health
$507
$12
Hospitals
$236
$585
Parks & Recreation
$475
$284
Housing
$4,165
$2,809
Sewerage
$152
$116
Utilities
$0
$1,704
Other
$6,233
$12,850
D
Cranston, RI
Fiscal Health Score: 47/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Warwick, RI
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities