Vancouver, WA vs Spokane Valley, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Vancouver, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $13,434 versus $5,097, a 164% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 45/100 (grade D) for Vancouver, WA — a 23-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $866 for Vancouver, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Vancouver, WA at $871 per resident and in Spokane Valley, WA at $259.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 114% of total revenue in Vancouver, WA and 34% in Spokane Valley, WA.
Summary
Vancouver spends 163.6% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($8,337/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $31 | $201 |
| Sales Tax | $456 | $17 |
| Income Tax | $140 | $26 |
| Intergovernmental | $141 | $100 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,641 | $0 |
| Other | $6,500 | $421 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $169 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $189 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $112 |
| Education | $3 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $968 | $784 |
| Hospitals | $661 | $221 |
| Parks & Recreation | $871 | $259 |
| Housing | $3,594 | $2,595 |
| Sewerage | $241 | $43 |
| Utilities | $2,481 | $31 |
| Other | $4,615 | $695 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.