Spokane Valley, WA vs Vancouver, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Vancouver, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $13,434 versus $5,097, a 164% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 45/100 (grade D) for Vancouver, WA — a 23-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $866 for Vancouver, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Spokane Valley, WA at $259 per resident and in Vancouver, WA at $871.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 34% of total revenue in Spokane Valley, WA and 114% in Vancouver, WA.
Summary
Vancouver spends 62.1% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($8,337/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $201 | $31 |
| Sales Tax | $17 | $456 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $140 |
| Intergovernmental | $100 | $141 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,641 |
| Other | $421 | $6,500 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $169 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $189 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $112 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3 |
| Public Welfare | $784 | $968 |
| Hospitals | $221 | $661 |
| Parks & Recreation | $259 | $871 |
| Housing | $2,595 | $3,594 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $241 |
| Utilities | $31 | $2,481 |
| Other | $695 | $4,615 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.