Vancouver, WA vs Kent, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Vancouver spends 28.1% more per capita than Kent ($2,943/person difference). Kent, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $31 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $456 | $272 |
| Income Tax | $140 | $89 |
| Intergovernmental | $141 | $1,884 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,641 | $1,797 |
| Other | $6,500 | $4,935 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $413 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $292 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | -$10 |
| Education | $3 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $968 | $850 |
| Health | $0 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $661 | $207 |
| Parks & Recreation | $871 | $1,448 |
| Housing | $3,594 | $3,476 |
| Sewerage | $241 | $36 |
| Utilities | $2,481 | $1,474 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1 |
| Other | $4,615 | $2,306 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.