Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Vancouver, WA vs Kent, WA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Vancouver spends 28.1% more per capita than Kent ($2,943/person difference). Kent, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Vancouver, WA
Pop. 190,700
D
45/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden46
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Kent, WA
Pop. 135,169
C
57/100
Budget Balance34
Debt Burden41
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity54
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Vancouver
Kent
Total Spending
$2.6B
$1.4B
Spending / Capita
$13,434
$10,491
Total Revenue
$1.1B
$1.4B
Revenue / Capita
$5,713
$10,134
Total Debt
$165.1M
$122.3M
Debt / Capita
$866
$905
Population
190,700
135,169
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Vancouver$0
Kent$413
Fire Protection
Vancouver$0
Kent$292
Parks & Recreation
Vancouver$871
Kent$1,448
Education
Vancouver$3
Kent$0
Health
Vancouver$0
Kent$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

VancouverKent
Property Tax
$31
$0
Sales Tax
$456
$272
Income Tax
$140
$89
Intergovernmental
$141
$1,884
Charges & Fees
$2,641
$1,797
Other
$6,500
$4,935

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

VancouverKent
Police
$0
$413
Fire Protection
$0
$292
Highways & Roads
$0
-$10
Education
$3
$0
Public Welfare
$968
$850
Health
$0
$0
Hospitals
$661
$207
Parks & Recreation
$871
$1,448
Housing
$3,594
$3,476
Sewerage
$241
$36
Utilities
$2,481
$1,474
Interest on Debt
$0
$1
Other
$4,615
$2,306
D
Vancouver, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 45/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Kent, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 57/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities