Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Kent, WA vs Vancouver, WA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Vancouver spends 21.9% more per capita than Kent ($2,943/person difference). Kent, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Kent, WA
Pop. 135,169
C
57/100
Budget Balance34
Debt Burden41
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity54
Trend Direction50
City B
Vancouver, WA
Pop. 190,700
D
45/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden46
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Kent
Vancouver
Total Spending
$1.4B
$2.6B
Spending / Capita
$10,491
$13,434
Total Revenue
$1.4B
$1.1B
Revenue / Capita
$10,134
$5,713
Total Debt
$122.3M
$165.1M
Debt / Capita
$905
$866
Population
135,169
190,700
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Kent$413
Vancouver$0
Fire Protection
Kent$292
Vancouver$0
Parks & Recreation
Kent$1,448
Vancouver$871
Education
Kent$0
Vancouver$3
Health
Kent$0
Vancouver$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

KentVancouver
Property Tax
$0
$31
Sales Tax
$272
$456
Income Tax
$89
$140
Intergovernmental
$1,884
$141
Charges & Fees
$1,797
$2,641
Other
$4,935
$6,500

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

KentVancouver
Police
$413
$0
Fire Protection
$292
$0
Highways & Roads
-$10
$0
Education
$0
$3
Public Welfare
$850
$968
Health
$0
$0
Hospitals
$207
$661
Parks & Recreation
$1,448
$871
Housing
$3,476
$3,594
Sewerage
$36
$241
Utilities
$1,474
$2,481
Interest on Debt
$1
$0
Other
$2,306
$4,615
C
Kent, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 57/100
Average fiscal health
D
Vancouver, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 45/100
Below average fiscal health

Compare More Cities