Tulsa, OK vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 97.1% more per capita than Tulsa ($178,881/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Tulsa
San Francisco
Total Spending
$2.2B
$156.7B
Spending / Capita
$5,250
$184,131
Total Revenue
$0
$232.3B
Revenue / Capita
$0
$272,907
Total Debt
$0
$1.7B
Debt / Capita
$0
$2,031
Population
411,938
851,036
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Tulsa$628
San Francisco$3,351
Fire Protection
Tulsa$196
San Francisco$2,281
Highways & Roads
Tulsa$257
San Francisco$0
Parks & Recreation
Tulsa$154
San Francisco$4,119
Health
Tulsa$762
San Francisco$1,911
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaSan Francisco
| Property Tax | $0 | $148 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $3,028 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $269 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $19,762 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $7,961 |
| Other | $53 | $18,918 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaSan Francisco
| Police | $628 | $3,351 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $2,281 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $2,203 |
| Health | $762 | $1,911 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $6,939 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $4,119 |
| Housing | $350 | $9,315 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $1,423 |
| Utilities | $41 | $21,190 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $22,798 |
| General Admin | $0 | $14,899 |
| Other | $2,748 | $93,702 |
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health