San Francisco, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 3407.1% more per capita than Tulsa ($178,881/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
San Francisco
Tulsa
Total Spending
$156.7B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$184,131
$5,250
Total Revenue
$232.3B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$272,907
$0
Total Debt
$1.7B
$0
Debt / Capita
$2,031
$0
Population
851,036
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
San Francisco$3,351
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
San Francisco$2,281
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
San Francisco$0
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
San Francisco$4,119
Tulsa$154
Health
San Francisco$1,911
Tulsa$762
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoTulsa
| Property Tax | $148 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $0 |
| Other | $18,918 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoTulsa
| Police | $3,351 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $86 |
| Health | $1,911 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $154 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $27 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $0 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $2,748 |
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health