Tulsa, OK vs Raleigh, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Raleigh, NC outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $13,911 versus $5,250, a 165% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 76/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Raleigh, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,391.
Summary
Raleigh spends 62.3% more per capita than Tulsa ($8,661/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $858 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $806 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $14,128 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,681 |
| Other | $53 | $4,740 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $277 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $448 |
| Education | $0 | $6 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $498 |
| Health | $762 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $669 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,391 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,712 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $281 |
| Utilities | $41 | $2,469 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,513 |
| Other | $2,748 | $3,646 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.