Raleigh, NC vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Raleigh, NC outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $13,911 versus $5,250, a 165% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 76/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Raleigh, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,391 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Raleigh spends 165.0% more per capita than Tulsa ($8,661/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $858 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $806 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,128 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,681 | $0 |
| Other | $4,740 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $277 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $448 | $257 |
| Education | $6 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $498 | $86 |
| Health | $0 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $669 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,391 | $154 |
| Housing | $2,712 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $281 | $27 |
| Utilities | $2,469 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,513 | $0 |
| Other | $3,646 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.