Tulsa, OK vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Omaha spends 53.0% more per capita than Tulsa ($5,930/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Metric
Tulsa
Omaha
Total Spending
$2.2B
$5.5B
Spending / Capita
$5,250
$11,180
Total Revenue
$0
$13.2B
Revenue / Capita
$0
$26,929
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
411,938
489,201
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Tulsa$628
Omaha$0
Fire Protection
Tulsa$196
Omaha$0
Highways & Roads
Tulsa$257
Omaha$319
Parks & Recreation
Tulsa$154
Omaha$742
Health
Tulsa$762
Omaha$456
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaOmaha
| Property Tax | $0 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $373 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $2,622 |
| Other | $53 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaOmaha
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $319 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,521 |
| Health | $762 | $456 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $742 |
| Housing | $350 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $581 |
| Other | $2,748 | $4,516 |
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health