Omaha, NE vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Omaha spends 112.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($5,930/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Metric
Omaha
Tulsa
Total Spending
$5.5B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$11,180
$5,250
Total Revenue
$13.2B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$26,929
$0
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
489,201
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Omaha$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Omaha$0
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Omaha$319
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Omaha$742
Tulsa$154
Health
Omaha$456
Tulsa$762
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaTulsa
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $97 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $0 |
| Other | $4,672 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OmahaTulsa
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $86 |
| Health | $456 | $762 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $154 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $27 |
| Utilities | $581 | $41 |
| Other | $4,516 | $2,748 |
A
Omaha, NE
Fiscal Health Score: 90/100
Excellent fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health