Omaha, NE vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Omaha spends 112.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($5,930/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $624 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $373 | $97 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,622 | $0 |
| Other | $4,672 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $319 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $1,521 | $86 |
| Health | $456 | $762 |
| Parks & Recreation | $742 | $154 |
| Housing | $3,045 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $27 |
| Utilities | $581 | $41 |
| Other | $4,516 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.