Tulsa, OK vs Oakland, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Oakland spends 82.5% more per capita than Tulsa ($24,804/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
B
72/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency43
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Tulsa
Oakland
Total Spending
$2.2B
$13.2B
Spending / Capita
$5,250
$30,055
Total Revenue
$0
$18.5B
Revenue / Capita
$0
$42,277
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
411,938
437,825
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Tulsa$628
Oakland$0
Fire Protection
Tulsa$196
Oakland$1
Highways & Roads
Tulsa$257
Oakland$0
Parks & Recreation
Tulsa$154
Oakland$955
Health
Tulsa$762
Oakland$1,016
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaOakland
| Sales Tax | $97 | $522 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $42,277 |
| Other | $53 | $4,337 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
TulsaOakland
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $1 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $2,426 |
| Health | $762 | $1,016 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,498 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $955 |
| Housing | $350 | $7,811 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $1,417 |
| Utilities | $41 | $0 |
| Other | $2,748 | $13,929 |
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
B
Oakland, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 72/100
Good fiscal health