Oakland, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Oakland spends 472.4% more per capita than Tulsa ($24,804/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
B
72/100
Budget Balance100
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency43
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
Oakland
Tulsa
Total Spending
$13.2B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$30,055
$5,250
Total Revenue
$18.5B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$42,277
$0
Total Debt
$0
$0
Debt / Capita
$0
$0
Population
437,825
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
Oakland$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Oakland$1
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Oakland$0
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Oakland$955
Tulsa$154
Health
Oakland$1,016
Tulsa$762
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
OaklandTulsa
| Sales Tax | $522 | $97 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $0 |
| Other | $4,337 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
OaklandTulsa
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $1 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $86 |
| Health | $1,016 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $154 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $27 |
| Utilities | $0 | $41 |
| Other | $13,929 | $2,748 |
B
Oakland, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 72/100
Good fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health