Oakland, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Oakland, CA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $30,055 versus $5,250, a 472% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oakland, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 72/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 16-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: health leads in Oakland, CA at $1,016 per resident and in Tulsa, OK at $762.
Summary
Oakland spends 472.4% more per capita than Tulsa ($24,804/person difference). Oakland, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 72/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $522 | $97 |
| Intergovernmental | $42,277 | $0 |
| Other | $4,337 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $1 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $2,426 | $86 |
| Health | $1,016 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $2,498 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $955 | $154 |
| Housing | $7,811 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $1,417 | $27 |
| Utilities | $0 | $41 |
| Other | $13,929 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.