Tulsa, OK vs Norman, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Norman, OK outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $55,648 versus $5,250, a 960% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Tulsa, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 42/100 (grade D) for Norman, OK — a 14-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Norman, OK carries $781 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Norman, OK leads with parks and recreation at $1,197.
Summary
Norman spends 90.6% more per capita than Tulsa ($50,398/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $383 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $2,695 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $3,093 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,061 |
| Other | $53 | $1,341 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $258 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $2,391 |
| Health | $762 | $49 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $162 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,197 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,662 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $139 |
| Utilities | $41 | $2,276 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $536 |
| General Admin | $0 | $42,647 |
| Other | $2,748 | $3,331 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.