Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Norman, OK vs Tulsa, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Norman spends 959.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($50,398/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Norman, OK
Pop. 127,701
D
42/100
Budget Balance1
Debt Burden56
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Norman
Tulsa
Total Spending
$7.1B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$55,648
$5,250
Total Revenue
$5.1B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$40,091
$0
Total Debt
$99.7M
$0
Debt / Capita
$781
$0
Population
127,701
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Norman$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Norman$258
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Norman$0
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Norman$1,197
Tulsa$154
Health
Norman$49
Tulsa$762

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

NormanTulsa
Sales Tax
$383
$97
Income Tax
$2,695
$0
Intergovernmental
$3,093
$0
Charges & Fees
$2,061
$0
Other
$1,341
$53

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

NormanTulsa
Police
$0
$628
Fire Protection
$258
$196
Highways & Roads
$0
$257
Public Welfare
$2,391
$86
Health
$49
$762
Hospitals
$162
$0
Parks & Recreation
$1,197
$154
Housing
$2,662
$350
Sewerage
$139
$27
Utilities
$2,276
$41
Interest on Debt
$536
$0
General Admin
$42,647
$0
Other
$3,331
$2,748
D
Norman, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 42/100
Below average fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities