Norman, OK vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Norman, OK outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $55,648 versus $5,250, a 960% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Tulsa, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 56/100 (grade C) against 42/100 (grade D) for Norman, OK — a 14-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Norman, OK carries $781 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Norman, OK leads with parks and recreation at $1,197 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Norman spends 959.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($50,398/person difference). Tulsa, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 56/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $383 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $2,695 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,093 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,061 | $0 |
| Other | $1,341 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $258 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $2,391 | $86 |
| Health | $49 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $162 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,197 | $154 |
| Housing | $2,662 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $139 | $27 |
| Utilities | $2,276 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $536 | $0 |
| General Admin | $42,647 | $0 |
| Other | $3,331 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.