Tulsa, OK vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $5,250, a 317% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 76.0% more per capita than Tulsa ($16,660/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,040 |
| Other | $53 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,500 |
| Health | $762 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $350 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $570 |
| Utilities | $41 | $2,398 |
| Other | $2,748 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.