Minneapolis, MN vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Minneapolis, MN outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $21,910 versus $5,250, a 317% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 9-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Minneapolis spends 317.3% more per capita than Tulsa ($16,660/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,989 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $994 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,929 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,040 | $0 |
| Other | $3,254 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $683 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $221 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $1,500 | $86 |
| Health | $0 | $762 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,486 | $154 |
| Housing | $4,133 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $570 | $27 |
| Utilities | $2,398 | $41 |
| Other | $8,919 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.