Tulsa, OK vs Long Beach, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Long Beach, CA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $34,250 versus $5,250, a 552% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Long Beach, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 67/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Long Beach, CA leads with parks and recreation at $698.
Summary
Long Beach spends 84.7% more per capita than Tulsa ($29,000/person difference). Long Beach, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $36 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,760 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $1,688 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,424 |
| Other | $53 | $8,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,317 |
| Health | $762 | $477 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,751 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $698 |
| Housing | $350 | $5,782 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $86 |
| Utilities | $41 | $3,889 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $2,718 |
| Other | $2,748 | $16,533 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.