Long Beach, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Long Beach, CA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $34,250 versus $5,250, a 552% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Long Beach, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 67/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 11-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Long Beach, CA leads with parks and recreation at $698 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Long Beach spends 552.4% more per capita than Tulsa ($29,000/person difference). Long Beach, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $36 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $1,760 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,688 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,424 | $0 |
| Other | $8,836 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $1,317 | $86 |
| Health | $477 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $2,751 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $698 | $154 |
| Housing | $5,782 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $86 | $27 |
| Utilities | $3,889 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $2,718 | $0 |
| Other | $16,533 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.