Tulsa, OK vs Las Vegas, NV
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Las Vegas, NV outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $9,085 versus $5,250, a 73% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Las Vegas, NV holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 82/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 26-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Las Vegas, NV leads with parks and recreation at $1,028.
Summary
Las Vegas spends 42.2% more per capita than Tulsa ($3,835/person difference). Las Vegas, NV has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $50 |
| Sales Tax | $97 | $386 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $1,137 |
| Other | $53 | $2,806 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $945 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $280 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $45 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $705 |
| Health | $762 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $356 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,028 |
| Housing | $350 | $23 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $332 |
| Utilities | $41 | $129 |
| Other | $2,748 | $5,243 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.