Las Vegas, NV vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Las Vegas, NV outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $9,085 versus $5,250, a 73% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Las Vegas, NV holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 82/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 26-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Las Vegas, NV leads with parks and recreation at $1,028 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Las Vegas spends 73.0% more per capita than Tulsa ($3,835/person difference). Las Vegas, NV has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $50 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $386 | $97 |
| Intergovernmental | $1,137 | $0 |
| Other | $2,806 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $945 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $280 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $45 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $705 | $86 |
| Health | $0 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $356 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,028 | $154 |
| Housing | $23 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $332 | $27 |
| Utilities | $129 | $41 |
| Other | $5,243 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.