Tulsa, OK vs Colorado Springs, CO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Colorado Springs, CO outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $13,222 versus $5,250, a 152% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Colorado Springs, CO edges Tulsa, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 59/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266.
Summary
Colorado Springs spends 60.3% more per capita than Tulsa ($7,972/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $257 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $6,902 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $5,676 |
| Other | $53 | $2,678 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $1,266 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $575 |
| Health | $762 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $416 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $376 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,713 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $2,566 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $190 |
| Other | $2,748 | $5,120 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.