Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Tulsa, OK vs Colorado Springs, CO

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Colorado Springs spends 60.3% more per capita than Tulsa ($7,972/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Colorado Springs, CO
Pop. 479,612
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Tulsa
Colorado Springs
Total Spending
$2.2B
$6.3B
Spending / Capita
$5,250
$13,222
Total Revenue
$0
$25.3B
Revenue / Capita
$0
$52,777
Total Debt
$0
$1.5B
Debt / Capita
$0
$3,063
Population
411,938
479,612
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Tulsa$628
Colorado Springs$0
Fire Protection
Tulsa$196
Colorado Springs$1,266
Highways & Roads
Tulsa$257
Colorado Springs$0
Parks & Recreation
Tulsa$154
Colorado Springs$376
Health
Tulsa$762
Colorado Springs$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

TulsaColorado Springs
Sales Tax
$97
$257
Intergovernmental
$0
$6,902
Charges & Fees
$0
$5,676
Other
$53
$2,678

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

TulsaColorado Springs
Police
$628
$0
Fire Protection
$196
$1,266
Highways & Roads
$257
$0
Public Welfare
$86
$575
Health
$762
$0
Hospitals
$0
$416
Parks & Recreation
$154
$376
Housing
$350
$2,713
Sewerage
$27
$0
Utilities
$41
$2,566
Interest on Debt
$0
$190
Other
$2,748
$5,120
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities