Colorado Springs, CO vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Colorado Springs, CO outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $13,222 versus $5,250, a 152% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Colorado Springs, CO edges Tulsa, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 59/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Colorado Springs, CO carries $3,063 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Colorado Springs, CO leads with fire protection at $1,266 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Colorado Springs spends 151.8% more per capita than Tulsa ($7,972/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $97 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $0 |
| Other | $2,678 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $86 |
| Health | $0 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $154 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $27 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.