Colorado Springs, CO vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Colorado Springs spends 151.8% more per capita than Tulsa ($7,972/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $257 | $97 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,902 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,676 | $0 |
| Other | $2,678 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $1,266 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $575 | $86 |
| Health | $0 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $416 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $376 | $154 |
| Housing | $2,713 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $27 |
| Utilities | $2,566 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $190 | $0 |
| Other | $5,120 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.