Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Colorado Springs, CO vs Tulsa, OK

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Colorado Springs spends 151.8% more per capita than Tulsa ($7,972/person difference). Colorado Springs, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Colorado Springs, CO
Pop. 479,612
C
59/100
Budget Balance54
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Colorado Springs
Tulsa
Total Spending
$6.3B
$2.2B
Spending / Capita
$13,222
$5,250
Total Revenue
$25.3B
$0
Revenue / Capita
$52,777
$0
Total Debt
$1.5B
$0
Debt / Capita
$3,063
$0
Population
479,612
411,938
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Colorado Springs$0
Tulsa$628
Fire Protection
Colorado Springs$1,266
Tulsa$196
Highways & Roads
Colorado Springs$0
Tulsa$257
Parks & Recreation
Colorado Springs$376
Tulsa$154
Health
Colorado Springs$0
Tulsa$762

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsTulsa
Sales Tax
$257
$97
Intergovernmental
$6,902
$0
Charges & Fees
$5,676
$0
Other
$2,678
$53

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

Colorado SpringsTulsa
Police
$0
$628
Fire Protection
$1,266
$196
Highways & Roads
$0
$257
Public Welfare
$575
$86
Health
$0
$762
Hospitals
$416
$0
Parks & Recreation
$376
$154
Housing
$2,713
$350
Sewerage
$0
$27
Utilities
$2,566
$41
Interest on Debt
$190
$0
Other
$5,120
$2,748
C
Colorado Springs, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 59/100
Average fiscal health
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities