Tulsa, OK vs Boston, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Boston, MA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $72,299 versus $5,250, a 1277% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Tulsa, OK and Boston, MA both land at 56/100 (grade C and C respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Boston, MA carries $445 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Boston, MA leads with education at $30,742.
Summary
Boston spends 92.7% more per capita than Tulsa ($67,048/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $78 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $5,357 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,784 |
| Other | $53 | $4,557 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $1,107 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $594 |
| Education | $0 | $30,742 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $1,110 |
| Health | $762 | $725 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,584 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $711 |
| Housing | $350 | $6,614 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $355 |
| Utilities | $41 | $3,402 |
| General Admin | $0 | $5,401 |
| Other | $2,748 | $18,955 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.