Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Tulsa, OK vs Boston, MA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Boston spends 92.7% more per capita than Tulsa ($67,048/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Tulsa, OK
Pop. 411,938
C
56/100
Budget Balance4
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Boston, MA
Pop. 665,945
C
56/100
Budget Balance25
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Tulsa
Boston
Total Spending
$2.2B
$48.1B
Spending / Capita
$5,250
$72,299
Total Revenue
$0
$20.8B
Revenue / Capita
$0
$31,243
Total Debt
$0
$296.3M
Debt / Capita
$0
$445
Population
411,938
665,945
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Tulsa$628
Boston$0
Fire Protection
Tulsa$196
Boston$1,107
Highways & Roads
Tulsa$257
Boston$594
Parks & Recreation
Tulsa$154
Boston$711
Education
Tulsa$0
Boston$30,742
Health
Tulsa$762
Boston$725

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

TulsaBoston
Sales Tax
$97
$78
Intergovernmental
$0
$5,357
Charges & Fees
$0
$2,784
Other
$53
$4,557

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

TulsaBoston
Police
$628
$0
Fire Protection
$196
$1,107
Highways & Roads
$257
$594
Education
$0
$30,742
Public Welfare
$86
$1,110
Health
$762
$725
Hospitals
$0
$2,584
Parks & Recreation
$154
$711
Housing
$350
$6,614
Sewerage
$27
$355
Utilities
$41
$3,402
General Admin
$0
$5,401
Other
$2,748
$18,955
C
Tulsa, OK
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health
C
Boston, MA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities